July 2011

Political Instability in Washington Manifests in New Challengers for 2012

Buddy Roemer and Americans Elect pose a different kind of threat to 2012 candidates.

     It's true that presidential candidates hold undue sway in lobbying legislative debates in Washington. Michelle Bachmann, a Tea Party darling and denier of the possible U.S. default on Tuesday (she believes that Obama is "deceiving the American people") has been lobbying her fellow Republicans in the House to press for deeper cuts even if it means not passing a budget by the August 2nd deadline. Unfortunately, she's made this a part of her campaign stumping sermon across Iowa and given the baseless notion more public support than it actually deserves. C'est la vie, such is Washington. However, this is not the only way that campaign politics is intersecting with Washington politics. The dysfunction in Washington, despite or in addition to how it's fueled by GOP candidates' pandering, is spawning some unique challenges in the 2012 election cycle.

Study: Free Birth Control Reduces Abortion Rate

Amazingly enough, cause leads to effect

 

Bam! Don't you love when a politically contested opinion you hold gets backed up by science? Science! It's the best guy to have on your debate team. Except when people don't believe in it. It's a little difficult to throw facts at somebody who doesn't believe in them. But for those who do believe in facts, here are a few to arm yourself with. A study in New Zealand recently found--shockingly enough--that making effective birth control more widely available leads to fewer abortions. Hard to believe that whole cause-and-effect thing still works so far from the equator (is New Zealand even a real place?) but there you go.

The study gave 510 women who had already had one abortion in their lifetimes free intrauterine devices. Compared to women on the pill, those who used an IUD were 64 percent less likely to come in for a repeat abortion. That's not a shabby number. IUDs are nifty little gadgets that don't require their users to remember to take a daily pill or even to swap out a monthly ring. You have them implanted and then you can forget about them for a couple of years. Unless they become dislodged, they're almost entirely effective at preventing the formation of new humans. 

Instability 2012: Fundraising Reports Shows Republican Weak Sauce

Romney leads the opposition. Gingrich dead-in-the-water. Perry probably running. TPaw vs. Bachmann. Huntsman vs. Romney. Cain Hates Muslims.

     New developments this week in the 2012 race for the Republican nomination begin with the release of campaign finance disclosure reports. Obama has already taken a position at the top of the heap, disclosing an astounding $86.7 million, $21 million of which came from the President's substantial grassroots network (donations of $200 dollars or less). According to the LA Times, campaign manager Jim Messina declared this to be proof that their "grass roots supporters will be engaged...our people are back and energized." However, Obama also did considerably well with large donations and special interests. Of course, it's not all about the Benjamins. The Progressive Change Campaign Committee has publicly disclosed 200,000 members that will reuse to donate or volunteer for the President if entitlements like Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security are cut. This is one of the first real manifestations of progressive liberal unhappiness with Obama on the campaign trail.

     The front-runner in the GOP field is Mitt Romney, with $18.3 million in the bank. Romney has been the front-runner for some time now, though he's largely bypassed Iowa as a campaign stop (primarily because of their cold-shoulder in the 2008 caucus) and is counting on New Hampshire to carry him. In fact, Romney seems so confident in New Hampshire that he is running a bare bones campaign office in Manchester, with only 7 staffers compared to 14 at this point in 2008, according to The Huffington Post. Of course, this may have something to with the fact that at this point in the game his campaign piggy bank is over four times that of the next highest earning candidates.

     With that, we have the GOP 'betas'; Texas Congressman Ron Paul with $4.5 million, former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty with $4.3 million, Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann with $4.2 million, and former Utah governor Jon Huntsman with $4.1 million (he says, but won't need to report until October due to a late entrance). A bit like cattle in a bottleneck, all four of these candidates have run into a problem of differentiation which is keeping them from pulling ahead of the pack (with the possible exception of Ron Paul, who is too different). With the Minnesota shutdown to contend with, both Pawlenty and Bachmann are at one another's throats; Bachmann for Pawlenty's hand in a $5 billion budget shortfall in the state of Minnesota and Pawlenty for Bachmann's lack of executive experience and dubious congressional record. This had to happen eventually, being from the same state and the only one to go into partial shutdown twice in five years. Also, with the revelation of Bachmann's lead in Iowa polls, Pawlenty needs to stall her momentum.

     In addition, Huntsman has seemingly abandoned some of his "civility" pledge in campaigning by taking pot-shots at Romney's record of job creation in Massachusetts as governor. The issue at hand for Huntsman is that he's practically the same guy as Romney; both former governors, both Mormon, both moderate (compared to the contemporary Republican reactionary) and both have some of the same individuals in their political networks. They even kind of look alike in that middle-aged, buttoned-down, slicked-back, white-guy kind of way (hey, you ask for quality reporting, you get it).

     Perhaps most interesting in this pack of Betas is Ron Paul's recent move against the entire Republican establishment on the debt-ceiling negotiations and, really, previous decade of budget-making. His stance? No Deal. No kidding, what a surprise. His attacks come in the form of his first video ad, Conviction. The guy does maintain some serious political capital in the realm of congressional budgets and national debt, which he has used as a campaign platform since his run as a Libertarian in '88. Watch the video below:

    The 'deltas', former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Godfather's CEO Herman Cain, reported $2.1 million and $2 million respectively. With the mass exodus of top staffers in early June and a dismal campaign finance disclosure Newt Gingrich's campaign seems to be running out of time. In early voting states like Iowa and new Hampshire his offices are run largely by volunteers, according to a Huffington Post report, though he admonishes doubters by saying that his kind of "internet-drive campaign...can function with a lean staff." However, a Republican political analyst from his home state of Georgia says he's not a "serious candidate" and even refers to him as "delusional".

     Herman Cain has made some further controversial remarks (remember the alligator-filled border-moats?) that have proved once again that the man has no filter. Cain said on Fox News Sunday that American communities have the right to ban mosques in their communities, rationalizing it by applying "the separation of church and state." He accuses mosques of attempting to incorporate Sharia law, or the laws of the Koran, into American law. "Islam is both a religion and a set of laws -- Sharia laws. That's the difference between any one of our traditional religions where it's just about religious purposes." Herman Cain has managed to prove, in a single interview, that he doesn't understand either constitutional law OR religion. Ever heard of the Twelve Commandments? How about The Pillars of Buddhism? These religious tenants are considered part and parcel of religious practice, and American courts, not swayed by or incorporating any piece of them, take them into consideration when making a ruling. Bigot.

     Former Senator from Pennsylvania, Rick Santorum raised about $528,000. Why's he running?

     The loose cards in the deck, Texas Governor Rick Perry and perennial campaigner and surreality-celebrity Sarah Palin, continue to flirt with a 2012 run. Though Palin is largely a side-show attraction at this point, particularly with Michelle Bachmann (the other Tea Party pin-up girl) building steam in Iowa, Rick Perry is the guy to watch. A recent Time U.S. report shows he has popular support from many right-wingers given his fiscal hatchet-job in Texas, and has already been pseudo-campaigning in Iowa and South Carolina. If he does run, and look for an entry in August before the Iowa Straw Poll, he'll be a target rich environment for GOP opponents. He was a Democrat until the late 80's, and flip-flopped to get the vote for a Texas state position. He even was an early supporter of Al Gore, donating and working for his campaign. From the Democratic side he is perhaps one of the most unpopular governors in Texas history, and has done more to eviscerate public services, while greasing the works for tax breaks on things like luxury yachts. Not the kind of thing that gets a lot of people excited in the current economic climate.

     Stay tuned for more instability at 2012 Voters!

2012 GOPers To Wear Corporate Sponsors on Sleeves like NASCAR Drivers

How conservatives are selling out the American people by protecting corporate tax evasion.

     Given the state of the economy today, and the massive national deficit, attention is inevitably focused on tax revenue. One doesn't want to over-tax individuals who are already struggling as it is, but neither do you want to drive up the deficit by decreasing tax revenue. The Republican Party has taken an interesting stand on this issue, advocating for cutting spending on entitlements like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security at a time when middle-class and low-income Americans depend on those programs most heavily, and at the same time protecting the wealthiest Americans, corporations, and special interests from tax hikes and closed tax loopholes. By 'interesting' I meant totally, undeniably, irrefutably corrupt. 

     In fact, many corporations have legions of lawyers whose only job is to find loopholes and tax shelters where the companies can avoid paying any taxes at all; Boeing, Bank of America, and GM to name a few. (Yes, taxpayers bailed out two of those three) These multinational companies have reported profits in the billions, yet Republicans have been protecting them from the evil Democratic tax revenue-hunters that threaten them in the current debt-ceiling negotiations waged in Washington. Among those that would protect these corporate tax-dodgers are GOP presidential hopefuls Herman Cain (no surprise there, being the former CEO of Godfather's Pizza) and Newt Gingrich.

     Gingrich, during a campaign stop on Monday in Pella, Iowa, addressed the problem of corporate tax dodgers like General Electric. According to ThinkProgress, Gingrich advocated cutting the corporate tax rate by nearly two-thirds in order to increase corporate tax revenue. Here's how Gingrich rationalizes his fuzzy math: Cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 12.5% and corporations, rather than hire teams of lawyers to figure out how to dodge their obligation and pay no taxes, will simply write a check and hand it to the government. Yeah, Newt, because that's what these corporations do; they write checks and hand them over. They hired teams of high-profile tax lawyers to find a way out of paying 35% of their profits in tax revenue to the government, but if it's only 12.5% they'll send their lawyers away?

Instability 2012: Republican Hopefuls Hopeless

From Mr. Bachmann's attempts to cure homosexuality to Herman Cain's alligator-filled border-moat, the GOP field never fails to disappoint.

    There've been a slough of examples of mini-madness this week, none of which require the kind of in-depth, penetrating reportage that say, Anthony Weiner's wiener demanded. However, the sheer volume of mental mismanagement this week from nearly everyone in the GOP field gives pause. The crazy, it seems, is spreading.

                           

Herman Cain Hits 3rd in Polls and Some Speedbumps

GOP Presidential Hopeful and Former Godfather's Pizza CEO Loses Staffers and Steam.

     Perhaps the least known candidate in the GOP field going in, former Godfather's Pizza CEO, Herman Cain entered with the intention of transforming his business savvy into political capital in the 2012 run for the Republican nomination. He had a respectable showing at the New Hampshire GOP presidential debate and his rhetoric as of the last few weeks has been heating up on everything from President Obama to the Economy to the pro-life debate. He's been successful in pandering to a large number of Tea Party voters and other social conservatives, edging out all but Michelle Bachmann for "Tea party Darling". However, in the last week he has seen a number of top staffers in two early polling states resign, and the specter of a "Newt Gingrich situatiom" is looming.

Stephen Colbert Shows Off His Super-PAC

Contributions to Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow

     Colbert has become an anomaly in the world of entertainment-news political commentary. His brand of entertainment satirizes the conservative Republican agenda by pretending to be a member of it, playing a blowhard conservative pundit on his show, The Colbert Report. However, not content to simply taunt from the safety of his studio, he has made a number of forays into the real world of politics. The latest instance, and perhaps the most risky to date, has been the creation of his own Stephen Colbert Super-PAC. Despite criticism and setting a risky precedent of connecting media corporations to political pandering, Colbert was successful yesterday in creating his Super-PAC, Contributions to Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow. The implications of this for the 2012 race are bigger than they might seem, and Colbert has gone much farther than making a joke, or even a point about campaign finance. He may change the game itself.

     In March, Colbert announced that he would create his own Super-PAC in response to Tim Pawlenty's announcement that he would crete a Super-PAC as the foundation of his presidential campaign financing. Super-PACS, as I wrote last month on Politics Report, is a new type of fundraising entity that is a result of the 2009 Supreme Court decision, Citizens United. The organization is allowed to take unlimited amounts of monies and use them to buy adspace and airtime in support of or to attack candidates of their choice.